Evolving Project Planning in Infrastructure
This article talks about the evolution of project planning, risk mitigation, and technology adoption in large infrastructure and metro projects to improve schedule and cost control.
Q1. You’ve managed planning, scheduling, costing and contract management across major infrastructure and metro projects. Could you briefly outline how your responsibilities evolved as you moved into senior planning leadership roles?
I began my career as a management trainee, where my role was largely centred on preparing smaller technical deliverables such as DPRs, DLRs, and similar reports. As I progressed into management-level positions, my responsibilities expanded to include independent preparation of project schedules, primarily using Primavera P6, after having worked earlier with MS Project.
Up to the AGM level, I was personally responsible for programme preparation. Even today, in certain situations, I continue to do so, largely because effective planning is closely linked to site experience. Without adequate exposure to site conditions, it becomes difficult to develop realistic programmes and budgets or to manage extensions of time, prolongation costs, claims, and variations effectively.
In addition to planning, I have managed Contract Management, MIS responsibilities, which have varied depending on the organisation. Currently, at the head office, I work with a small team, so I handle most planning activities myself. This covers scheduling, resource loading, physical and cost weightage, and quantity loading. By bringing all this data together in the programme,…
Create an account to continue reading
Create AccountAlready have an account? Sign in
Need an expert in this space?
Talk to an Industry Expert
Knowledge Ridge connects decision-makers with carefully vetted subject matter experts for one-on-one calls, research sprints, and advisory engagements — across 11 sectors and 163 sub-industries globally.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!