Hydrogen Transport: Technologies & Trends
This article compares compressed, liquefied, ammonia, and LOHC hydrogen transport, evaluating their pros, cons, and infrastructure needs, plus investor trends and renewable energy synergies shaping the sector.
Currently, different transport technologies for hydrogen are available. Yet, regarding costs, convenience, and technological readiness, it is essential to understand that the right choice depends on several factors.
The article below briefly overviews the most discussed technologies involving:
- Compressed hydrogen
- Liquefied hydrogen
- Ammonia
- LOHC
Approaches for Hydrogen Transportation
Compressed Hydrogen
From a practical perspective, powering heavy-duty vehicles (e.g., buses, trains, and trucks) favors compressed hydrogen, whether at 350 Bar or even up to 700 Bar. The 700 Bar solutions primarily depend on the available gas station infrastructure, which differs from country to country.
A minimum transport distance of 200-300 km is crucial since batteries are often a more economical solution for shorter distances.
Compressed hydrogen is also the preferred approach for storing and transporting hydrogen for up to 1000-2000 km.
Liquefied Hydrogen (LH2)
By contrast, the use of liquefied hydrogen has not solved the issue of boil-off gas so far. This causes a significant loss of hydrogen over time, making it a rather poor choice for powering vehicles. Hence, the (heavy-duty) mobility sector will also use compressed hydrogen in the near future.
However, looking at the transport of larger quantities of hydrogen (several tons) and longer distances (> 2000 km),…
Create an account to continue reading
Create AccountAlready have an account? Sign in
Need an expert in this space?
Talk to an Industry Expert
Knowledge Ridge connects decision-makers with carefully vetted subject matter experts for one-on-one calls, research sprints, and advisory engagements — across 11 sectors and 163 sub-industries globally.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!